The concept of ownership has become important in academic writing, as university faculty members encourage students to study in collaboration with other students and take advantage of a vast range of electronic resources. I believe that such an ease of finding relevant academic writing has both its positives and negatives. A student who would require long hours in a library to find credible references for a research paper can now search and access the same on online library systems, but it has become equally as challenging for faculty members to keep a check on plagiarism, and universities invest a to of resources to such checks i. . Turning. Com, wretched. Com (C. P. Havilland & J. A. Mullioned. , 2009). Different cultures perceive plagiarism in different light; the ‘western construct’ Of plagiarism believes that plagiarism undermines academic integrity and standards. Plagiarism also negates the value of intellectual property rights. But even in the western world there are communities that see no problem in copying text from other sources.
There is a lack of understanding that plagiarism is a concept created by society and not a universal concept, for example the Amiss community in the United States, often teach students in schools to copy text from other sources and see no ethical issue with the same (Veering & Norman, 2012). According to McKay (2004), most of the international students are non-native speakers of English, usually as a second or third language and therefore do have communicating or rephrasing in English.
Additionally, previous educational background with lack of understanding of western concept of plagiarism, are some of the primary cultural and ability-based factors behind he reasons some international students plagiarism (Lime and See, 2011). According to Maxwell et al. (2008), the perspective of plagiarism in education is changing over the past decades, especially in the case of English as a Second Language (SSL) students.
Many educators now understand the complexity of the concept and its cultural dependencies, which has bought up a change in the view of plagiarism. There has been a withdrawal from the memorized view of plagiarism, to an inquiring attitude with a desire to understand the cultural differences and other factors that affect such behavior. Believe that the definition of the location where the material was popularized should be used as that is the only way it could work. As each region could have a different understanding of plagiarism.