Your essay should include an introduction, body, and conclusion, and should use information from both the article (citing your source correctly) and your own insight and experience. . Be sure to take a clear stand and discuss it appropriately. 4. Support your opinions by using the article and your own ideas to strengthen your main points. 5. When you are finished, look over your essay and correct any errors before you turn it in. 6. You will have a total of 50 minutes to complete your essay.
Essay Question: A “trigger,” in the context of academia, is any course material that initiates (or “triggers”) a stressful reaction in students who have sun. ‘ivied a traumatic situation. Oberlin College recently instituted a “trigger-varying policy” for heir faculty, which advised professors to “[u]understand triggers, avoid unnecessary triggers, and provide trigger warnings. ” Should GUCCI implement a similar trigger-warning policy to protect students from potentially upsetting course material? Why or why not?
Article: Trigger Unhappy April 14, 2014 By Colleen Flattery Trigger* warnings, which have begun to appear on college and university syllabuses, are supposed to signal to readers that forthcoming material may be uncomfortable or upsetting. Trigger warned-subject matter – in literature, films or other texts – usually relates to sexual assault and other kinds of lenience, racism, and the like, and advocates say students have a right to know Of sensitive material in advance. But some critics of trigger warnings say that higher education is rooted in confronting uncomfortable ideas and experiences.
And more practically, critics say, it’s nearly impossible in classes with students with differing sensibilities to define what deserves a trigger warning. Given the lack of consensus on trigger warnings in the classroom, it was perhaps unsurprising that the extensive trigger warning policy Oberlin College published in its Sexual Offense Resource Guide proved controversial earlier this academic ear. Faculty members criticized the policy from within, saying it had been drafted largely without their input, even though they stood on the front lines of such a policy.